Unschooling is an alternative education movement quickly
gaining popularity and currency worldwide. Like Bitcoin, it is an
individualist approach to an area of human action long thought to be
established beyond question―education. Both cryptoeconomics and
unschooling seek to provide autonomy to individuals, providing a return
to logical, natural systems that value human life.
What Is Unschooling?
Unschooling is a buzzword popping up in random conversations,
hashtagged heavily on social media, and a source of bewilderment for
those who may know what ‘homeschooling’ is, but have never heard of this
sister term. Unschooling. Unlearning. These sound on the surface like
steps backward from the goals of centralized, compulsory education. And they are.
The oft-misunderstood term was coined by late U.S. school teacher-turned-unschooling advocate John Holt. In 1964 Holt wrote How Children Fail,
whose outlined methodologies and observations would ultimately cost him
his job―and bring him to the forefront of the unschooling movement.
Holt’s legacy can be summed up in part by his brief observation:
“Learning is not the product of teaching. Learning is the product of the activity of learners.”
Unschooling Meets Crypto-Anarchy
At the time of writing, the Homeschooling Global Summit
(June 17-29) is well underway. It’s an online event featuring 20+
homeschooling and unschooling advocates, speakers, and teachers. Some on
the roster include Sir Ken Robinson, psychologist and founder of the
Alliance for Self-Directed Education, Peter Gray, and Didi Taihuttu,
“The Bitcoin Family” dad. Taihuttu sold most of his belongings back in
2017 to get into Bitcoin. Why?
I started to question the materialistic life, the
economical system and the schooling of our kids and as a family we
decided we needed to change and we did.
While Taihutti’s story is certainly one of the more visible examples,
there are many others beside him choosing to live “outside the system”
in some way or another, with crypto as a tool facilitating this. It
affords flexibility. These are living examples of decentralized money
and self-directed learning in action. And human action is ultimately
what this all comes down to.
Austrian School economist Ludwig von Mises wrote something similar to
John Holt on learning, except regarding market action, noting in Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis:
“All rational action is in the first place individual action. Only the
individual thinks. Only the individual reasons. Only the individual
acts.”
Holt and Mises were talking about the same reality, just applied to
different―albeit overlapping and inextricably integrated―areas of human
action. Both unschooling and Austrian economic principles stem from a
sound understanding of property and individual self-ownership.
An individual member of a group is still an individual without the
abstraction called the “group.” The corollary does not hold true,
however. A group without individuals is absolutely nothing. Only
individual humans learn, and only individual market actors act.
A lot has changed since 2009. Like trendy talk about unschooling,
though the concept of decentralization was not new when it began to gain
social traction thanks to Bitcoin. The Crypto Anarchist Manifesto had already called it, loud and clear, way back in 1988:
“Computer technology is on the verge of providing the
ability for individuals and groups to communicate and interact with each
other in a totally anonymous manner. Two persons may exchange messages,
conduct business, and negotiate electronic contracts without ever
knowing the True Name, or legal identity, of the other.”
The manifesto goes on make many more prescient observations, an
important reminder that the current evolution taking hold has been in
the works for a long time.
The Roof Is on Fire, Send Gasoline
What can now be seen in state-sanctioned finance and education is an
attempt to put out a “fire” from the inside of a collapsing, burning
building―and to do so, moreover, with even more fire and gasoline. The
“solution” being implemented is to the tune of billions in taxpayer dollars
each year. Both state-sanctioned systems are failing miserably; failing
the individuals forced to pay for them, in ways too numerous to name.
In education, this failure is evidenced by declining academic performance, arrest of elementary school students, physically and sexually abusive teachers,
and of course the taking by force of 12 of the most important years of
one’s life, not to mention repeated, blatant instances of direct
kidnapping. Take Sweden, where individuals must run from the law or hide, with almost zero chance at exemption, just to choose the type of education their child receives. In the U.S, CPS kidnappings have become a real problem as well.
Where financial institutions are concerned, euphemized theft, gross
fiscal irresponsibility, and outright violence against non-violent market actors
abound. The question to be asked here is not how to put out the fire,
but why the buildings are allowed to stand in the first place.
Human Nodes – Keys to the Kingdom
Flash-triggered, massive, avalanche-style decentralization of
information followed the advent of the internet. The advent of Bitcoin
and blockchain―this time the decentralization of trade and monetary
systems―will continue to have similar implications of equally profound,
if not greater, importance. Uber, Spotify, Airbnb and others are
decentralizing legacy business models, giving customers the keys to
their platforms, leveraging their userbases to do much of the heavy
lifting for them. The “decentralize everything” trend is catching on. In
just under 10 years the simple concept of Airbnb has enjoyed a 153%
global compound growth rate. Uber has grown to 3 million drivers and 75 million riders making it a $72B company.
Signals from decentralized human “nodes” using platforms like Uber
and others provide “boots on the ground” market data to business owners.
Millions of engaged, independent users can relay much more about
customer preference, market trends, and regional supply and demand cues
than any board of directors in some remote high-rise ever could.
The more independent nodes, the more robust the network. It’s true
for Bitcoin. It’s true for Uber and similar models. It should come as no
surprise then, that it’s true in education as well. The more market
options and opportunities for unschooling, community groups, student-led
learning centers etc, the higher the quality of life for individuals
set to do the learning.
A Return to Nature
The unschooling movement seeks the decentralization of education, and
is an abandonment of centralized, authoritarian models. Where Montessori,
charter schools, and state curriculum-based homeschooling might be the
“Uber” and “Spotify,” forming quasi-decentralized legacy models of
education, unschooling is far more radical.
It affords learners complete freedom to choose their own educational
path, just as blockchains do not tell one how, why, where, or when to
transact. Market actors know how they want to transact already, without
coercive oversight to “help.” The same holds true in learning. Nature
knows what it needs and wants to do. After all, if humans can become
conversational in difficult languages like Mandarin or English in just
the first three years of life, with no teachers, textbooks, or schools,
why do some imagine that without this building called “school” no
learning can take place?
The crypto and unschooling movements are a return to natural, logical
systems, and the rejection of dysfunctional, illogical, and
unsustainable ones. Unschooling is just another piece of the puzzle,
where individual self-ownership and property intersect with learning and
child development. As such, crypto enthusiasts are understandably
interested in learning more.
What is your take on government schools? Are unschooling
options available to you where you live? Let us know in the comments
section below.
OP-ed disclaimer: This is an Op-ed
article. The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own.
Bitcoin.com is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy
or quality within the Op-ed article. Readers should do their own due
diligence before taking any actions related to the content. Bitcoin.com
is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss
caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or
reliance on any information in this Op-ed article.
source link
