• latest news

    رسائل حب

    Arbitrum's first governance proposal sparks controversy with $1B at stake


     



    The Arbitrum Foundation announced that it was only ratifying an
    existing decision when it proposed a 750 million ARB tokens budget. 

     

    A proposal to fund the Arbitrum Foundation with 750 million ARB
    tokens — nearly $1 billion — raised controversy in the ARB community
    over the weekend, as the Foundation announced that it was only ratifying
    a decision that had already been made. 

    The conflict comes after a few days the layer-2 protocol airdropped its governance token.

    According
    to the AIP-1 proposal on Arbitrum's DAO, the 750 million tokens would
    be used to cover "Special Grants, reimbursing applicable service
    providers [...] and covering ongoing administrative and operational
    costs of The Arbitrum Foundation."

    Among tokens holders, over 70% are against the move at the time of writing.

    Screenshot: AIP-1: Arbitrum Improvement Proposal Framework. Source: Arbitrum DAO. 

    After facing backlash from community members, the Foundation said in a forum post
    on April 2 that AIP-1 was a ratification, not a proposal. It also noted
    that part of the tokens were already sold for stablecoins. In other
    words, its billionaire budget and allocations would not be subject to an
    on-chain governance process.

    The Arbitrum Foundation claims the
    symbolic first governance attempt failed due to communication problems
    and decisions that were "clearly not articulated correctly":

    "One
    of the mistakes in the drafting of AIP-1 was a failure to note at the
    outset that this proposal was intended to act as a ratification of the
    initial setup of both the Arbitrum DAO and the Foundation that has been
    created to serve the DAO. [...] the point of AIP-1 was to inform the
    community of all of the decisions that were made in advance."

    Commenting on the governance forum, members of the community pointed out
    that Arbitrum's team "has been dumping tokens that were initially
    informed to the community as locked tokens," claiming that "all
    tokenomics page shows only User airdrop + DAO airdrop tokens as
    unlocked" with remaining "tokens to unlock in March 2024."



    Others highlighted
    that under the United States securities laws, the anticipated sale
    would be considered fraud, and that U.S. citizens who have bought ARB
    tokens or claimed the airdrop "are eligible for legal remedies."

    "I
    will be pursuing this with my lawyers and expect to file a securities
    fraud lawsuit in the next few days. [...] Immediately, the Arbitrum
    Foundation is advised to halt all illegal sales of the token that are
    being done without any authorization and against the provisions of the
    law," said a community member.

    Arbitrum's blockchain holds 65%
    of the Ethereum layer 2 market share, shows data from the layer-2
    analytics site L2Beat. The highly anticipated launch and airdrop of its
    native governance token took place on March 23, with hundreds of
    thousands of eligible users and DAOs claiming ARBs. Overwhelming user
    demand led the airdrop claim page to crash shortly after its launch, Cointelegraph reported. 

    source link : https://cointelegraph.com/news/arbitrum-s-first-governance-proposal-sparks-controversy-with-1b-at-stake


    • تعليقات بلوجر
    • تعليقات الفيس بوك
    Item Reviewed: Arbitrum's first governance proposal sparks controversy with $1B at stake Rating: 5 Reviewed By: 66bitcoins
    إلى الأعلى