has been in the news quite often over the past few years — and usually
for all the wrong reasons. The social media giant has been lambasted
over its privacy practices, its seemingly anti-consumer stance and even
an apparent investor revolt in which shareholders voted (albeit
symbolically) to remove Mark Zuckerberg from the board of directors.
However, the company’s most recent announcement that it is launching a digital currency
appears to be finally turning the tide for Facebook. The new coin,
dubbed Libra, is a stablecoin of sorts, though it functions much
differently than currencies like tether. Additionally, Facebook has
built a blockchain to support Libra.
intends for the new cryptocurrency to be a replacement for paper money
and even credit cards, in many cases. The goal is to create a more
efficient payment system that holders can use immediately and directly
from their apps. This includes transferring money to friends or family
(much like Venmo, but without many of the restrictions), paying
merchants for services, and acting as a replacement for cash in
underbanked areas.
One of the company’s biggest stated goals
is for Libra to function as currency for migrant workers, unbanked
populations in the developing world and more. By creating a simple
system that offers similar fungibility to cash, Libra can help people
keep their funds safe and accessible, even without banks.
While
it definitely seems promising, there are questions about exactly how
Libra will operate, as well as who will oversee its management. However,
industry insiders and observers have hailed this as a positive
development for a niche sector desperately in need of mainstream appeal.
What is Libra?
In many ways, Libra is similar to other cryptocurrencies and especially stablecoins.
It is built on a native blockchain and backed by a reserve of several
currencies meant to mitigate the impact of price volatility. On the
other hand, the new digital currency
is different enough from other coins to warrant a closer look,
especially now that the team has released its testnet and accompanying
white paper.
According to the project’s leadership, the
idea for Libra is to operate more as digital cash than the traditional
speculative function most cryptocurrencies serve. To this end, Libra is
designed to be easier to transact with and to offer faster throughput
along with quicker validation times. Despite the similarity to
fiat-pegged stablecoins, Libra is an alternative that is fundamentally
and technically different — too different, some believe.
Libra strays from the beaten path
First,
Libra is a blockchain without the blocks, or the chains. While the
Libra blockchain is technically structured like many others, it
functions quite differently, relying on validators with permissioned
access rather than nodes on the chain. The white paper itself states,
“There is no concept of a block of transactions in the ledger history,” with data assigned to validators sequentially (by number) instead of in groups.
In
short, instead of operating like a traditional distributed ledger (in
clusters of data), the Libra blockchain uses a single data structure
that records all transactions and states over time. It is also worth
noting that currently, the validator network is made up of 27 companies —
including major names like Visa, MasterCard, PayPal, eBay, Uber and
Vodafone — which have each pledged $10 million for Libra’s development,
and the foundation plans to have up to 100 validators in total.
Related: WSJ: Facebook Crypto Project Seals $10M Investment Each From Visa, Mastercard, Paypal, Uber
Libra is based on a new programming language called Move, which will eventually be used for smart contracts,
and therefore full applications on the Libra “blockchain.” This is a
more complex procedure than the standard forking method most blockchains
utilize, as it requires a ground-up approach. However, due to Libra’s
goals and technical complexity, working on a proprietary framework makes
future development easier.
Due to these unique twists in the
traditional blockchain architecture, some experts argue that Libra isn’t
quite a blockchain. According to SilaMoney Chief Technology Officer
Alexander Lipton, for instance:
“Libra is NOT a
blockchain in the traditional sense, since it is lacking most, if not
all necessary attributes; it has to be open, public, censorship
resistant, immutable, neutral, etc. which Libra is not, based on the
whitepaper.”
To make use of the storage and
bandwidth, expect to pay Facebook — or the Libra Association — a fixed
fee. The fee, along with the basket of assets being held in the Libra
Reserve, is expected to be enough to cover Libra’s operational expenses,
as well as to pay out dividends to holders. While some have argued that
this model is unfeasible, others believe that even just the interest on
the reserve funds could be enough to keep investors receiving dividends
and cover operational overhead.
Others have noted that no matter
how its structured, Libra will still earn dividends. According to Alex
Frenkel, VP of product management at the Kin Ecosystem:
“The
white paper seems to indicate that Facebook won't get a cut through
transactions, but that doesn't mean that they don't stand to
substantially profit. Their focus on international remittances and
similarities to modern banking structures show that the Libra
Association could earn big dividends on the interest."
Moreover,
Libra promises some intriguing technical specifications. The blockchain
will use a byzantine fault tolerance (BFT) consensus method, which
helps expedite transactions due to lower verification thresholds and
faster validation times. It also makes it much more resistant to
bad-faith actors.
Additionally, the permissioned and
limited-access nature of the network reduces the overall load of
managing nodes. Though the resulting product will be fast — at an
estimated 1,000 transactions per second — the compromises made to get
there are enough for the biggest blockchain advocates to cry foul. Industry guru Andreas Antonopolous, for example, said:
“What
Facebook, or any company like Facebook, is proposing is not a
cryptocurrency. It doesn’t have any of the fundamental characteristics
of cryptocurrency. It doesn’t stand on the five pillars of an open
blockchain. These are open, public, neutral, censorship-resistant, and
borderless. Facebook has left true decentralization by the wayside in
exchange for broader industry appeal.”
The
issue of centralization weighs heavy on many of the new coin’s critics.
For one, blockchain’s goal is to remove the need for central control and
provide a more transparent transaction process. As Decred co-founder
Jake Yocom-Piatt notes, “Libra goes against the central ideological
underpinning of cryptocurrency — it’s not decentralized. Facebook has
already garnered a reputation for questionable privacy practices.”
The
president and founder of the Saga Foundation, Ido Sadeh Man, added
that, “If the control over the currency remains in the unelected hands
of Facebook and its commercial partners alone, this might very well turn
the dream into a nightmare for all of us.”
On the other
hand, Antoni Trenchev, co-founder and managing partner at Nexo, shared
with Cointelegraph perhaps the most popular opinion among consumers:
“We
believe that Libra’s concept of minimal volatility will lower foreign
exchange (FX) cost and facilitate even smoother cross-border trading
capabilities and social inclusion. Libra will bring broad financial
institutional support and will encourage mass adoption of
cryptocurrencies in a variety of activities, notably in e-commerce,
investments, social media interactions, the shared economy and beyond.”
Crypto shows cautious optimism
Although
new entrants to the market are usually seen as rivals, Libra’s testnet
and launch announcement have been met with general enthusiasm from the
broader crypto community. Despite the added pressure from a new major
player in the sector, the announcement is seen as an important step
toward mainstream acceptance of crypto. Tron founder and CEO Justin Sun told Cointelegraph:
"I'm
excited to see Facebook entering the blockchain space with its Project
Libra cryptocurrency. Just like JP Morgan and IBM, some of the biggest
companies in the world are starting to recognize the promise of
cryptocurrency and see its potential for changing the way consumers and
businesses interact globally.”
Even so, these optimistic statements come with some reservations. Facebook’s track record on privacy is still a concern to some observers, and even the United States Senate Banking Committee has set
a hearing to discuss Libra’s potential impact as well as regulatory
concerns. Echoing these concerns in some regard, Sun also acknowledged
that “there are of course many questions outstanding: regulation,
interoperability, and openness, to name just a few.”
Related: Binance Research: Facebook’s Libra Could Spark Additional Cryptocurrency Volume
Wanchain Foundation CEO and founder Jack Lu told Cointelegraph:
“This
is a truly important and monumental step for the blockchain and the
cryptocurrency industry. Gradually, Facebook’s coin will likely become
increasingly regulated, else governments will likely begin censoring
network participants (who are accredited investors and multinational
corporations).”
One of the biggest
advantages Facebook will have once it fully launches Libra is its
massive user base. Its ability to market to a captive audience could
help boost adoption numbers. In comments to Cointelegraph, Binance founder and CEO Changpeng Zhao noted:
probably has a hundred times more users than the cryptocurrency
industry combined today. The Facebook project will educate a lot of
people about cryptocurrency. Regardless of the criticisms targeted at
the company, I believe this is good for the industry in the long run.”
Let’s wait and see
For
now, Libra’s testnet is the first real glimpse the industry has had
into the new digital currency. Some are already comparing Libra to other
cryptocurrencies and remain skeptical. To many, Libra’s centralized
nature and the lack of transparency Facebook is generally known for make
it a dangerous tool. They see increasing regulation, especially as the
assets sustaining Libra’s price are controlled by a centralized legal
entity, making it easier to co-opt the system.
Others
see this difference as a positive. Xavier Rashotsky, the director of
special projects at blockchain firm Salt, notes that “we can be certain
that Libra will have a reasonably different profile than the
inflationary and economically volatile underpinnings of a USD-backed
stablecoin. Libra will compete with popularized stablecoins as a new,
innovative, and substitutable product deployed on proven and adopted
forums.”
Regardless, the creation of Facebook’s Libra remains a
potentially momentous occasion for the crypto community. The new coin
already has support from many corners in the sector and could be a major
step in the right direction for an industry looking for mainstream
legitimacy. While it is unlikely to fulfill the goal of a truly
decentralized currency, Libra could be a milestone into crypto becoming a
broadly accepted technology.
