The majority of global jurisdictions have crypto asset taxation 
guidelines, yet additional frameworks are required to keep up. 
One of the Founding 
Fathers of the United States, Benjamin Franklin, once said: “But in this
 world, nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.” 
While this phrase was realized in 1789, the same still holds true today.
 The only difference is that taxes are slowly but surely catching up 
with crypto assets.
Therefore, it shouldn’t come as a surprise 
that Big Four accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers has just released 
its first annual Crypto Tax Index as part of the “Global Crypto Tax Report.” The
 detailed report contains the latest global crypto tax developments, 
along with crypto tax information for over 30 jurisdictions. 
Interestingly, 61% of jurisdictions surveyed have issued guidance on the
 calculation of crypto capital gains and losses for individuals and 
businesses.

The
 survey’s Crypto Tax Index ranks jurisdictions based on the 
comprehensive structure of their tax guidance. The report shows that the
 tiny yet innovative European country of Liechtenstein tops this year’s 
rankings, closely followed by Malta and Australia. 

Crypto assets are finally taken seriously
Peter
 Brewin, a tax partner at PwC Hong Kong and a report contributor, told 
Cointelegraph that the industry is finally starting to see more activity
 by some of the supranational policy setters like the Organization for 
Economic Co-operation and Development. As a result, tax authorities have
 been showing an increasing interest in crypto assets, but these 
guidelines are dated:
“What our research shows is that
the guidance issued by many tax authorities is already getting dated.
Yes, it is important that people know how to account for tax on the
trading of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, but that is really crypto
tax 101.”
Although basic guidelines have been established on how to tax common crypto assets,
 Brewin points out that loopholes remain. “What we really need, and 
which is lacking in nearly all jurisdictions, is principles-based 
guidance that is fit for the new decentralized economy,” he said. 
That
 being said, one key takeaway from the report is that no jurisdiction 
has issued guidance yet on topics that are shaping the future of an 
economy built around digital assets. For instance, there are no taxation
 guidelines when it comes to crypto borrowing and lending, decentralized
 finance, nonfungible tokens, tokenized assets and staking income. 
This is alarming, considering the recent rise of DeFi and billions of dollars are being locked in DeFi contracts,
 as criminals may exploit the hype. While impressive, the PwC report 
highlights that without guidance, innovative companies and startups will
 be faced with significant tax uncertainty, especially in regards to 
cross-border activities. 
The document provides some 
recommendations; for example, when it comes to the taxation of DeFi, 
it’s mentioned that this should include how income from the DeFi 
platform is taxed at the recipient level and whether jurisdictions may 
seek to tax payments at the source. This is similar to how withholding 
taxes are commonly applied to interest payments in traditional finance.
The
 report also takes into account the crypto industry’s ever-changing 
ecosystem, therefore, noting that future guidance should be 
principles-based and not overly prescriptive. 
Crypto still primarily viewed as property
Another
 important finding in the report is that most jurisdictions view 
cryptocurrencies as a form of property from a tax perspective. In fact, 
very few consider digital assets as currency for taxation purposes. The 
report notes that this is because the disposal of property is considered
 similar to a barter transaction; therefore, results in a gain or loss 
could be subject to tax. 

Yet this isn’t the case in all jurisdictions. For instance, countries such as Israel are starting to propose that Bitcoin should be taxed as a currency. If this proposal becomes a law, digital currencies such as Bitcoin (BTC) could be taxed at a lower rate in Israel than those currently in place.
Although,
 having cryptocurrencies taxed as a currency could also result in 
challenges. The report points out that a tax change could potentially be
 triggered each time an individual spends a digital asset. This is 
problematic because many consumers are not able to calculate their gains
 or losses from each of their daily transactions. This is generally not 
the case with fiat but could be if cryptocurrencies were to be used, 
resulting in another barrier to mass adoption. 
Tax uncertainty will create challenges
Overall,
 PwC’s crypto tax report shows that while significant work has been done
 to provide guidance for the taxation of digital assets, the industry is
 not up-to-date with recent developments. In turn, businesses will 
continue to be faced with tax uncertainty, creating further challenges 
for adoption and innovation. 
While this may be, authorities are 
aware of the fact that new crypto taxation guidelines are needed. Mazhar
 Wani, fintech leader at PwC U.S., told Cointelegraph that while it’s 
tough to estimate when official guidance will be issued in regards to 
topics like DeFi and staking, these points are being discussed by global
 tax authorities. “The OECD is also looking at many of these points 
since it falls within their broader initiatives, so we hope to see 
something soon,” he said. However, Brewin points out that when it comes 
to DeFi, taxation clarity could take much longer:
“Particularly
when you have a fully decentralized platform, it’s not clear to me that
approach will work, given that you are dealing with a completely
different animal. We’ve not really seen a parallel for this when it
comes to tax.”
Although this may be, Brewin suggests that
 today’s challenges can be overcome if the industry continues to work 
with policymakers to ensure that they understand the complexity and 
ever-changing nature of the crypto industry. 
 source link : https://cointelegraph.com/news/pwc-s-global-crypto-tax-report-reveals-the-need-for-further-regulatory-guidance
