Australian citizen Katherine Nguyen has pleaded guilty to stealing $450,000 in XRP — over 100,000 tokens — in January 2018.
Local news channel 7News Sydney reported
the latest about the case on Aug. 23. According to the report, Nguyen
hacked into the email account of a man with the same last name. She then
proceeded to steal all of his XRP, before unlocking his account two
days later.
Police reportedly investigated the theft for 10 months
before locating and arresting her. Nguyen has since pleaded guilty to
the theft, for which she will reportedly face jail time. A special
hearing will be held in October to resolve some factual disputes and
determine her sentence.
Nguyen was first charged
with the crime in October 2018. Investigators then told the Sydney
Morning Herald that Nguyen transferred the tokens to a Chinese
cryptocurrency exchange where she swapped the tokens for Bitcoin (BTC) and subsequently sent them to multiple wallets. Cybercrime squad Commander Arthur Katsogiannis said:
"It's
a very significant crime and it's the first we know of its type in
Australia where an individual has been arrested and charged for the
technology-enabled theft of cryptocurrency."
Australia faces backlash over proposed cash restrictions
Yesterday, Australia received backlash
over a new bill that would put a limit on cash transactions — including
cryptocurrency transactions. The proposed bill, entitled "Currency
(Restrictions on the Use of Cash) Bill 2019," would ban all cash
transactions worth over 10,000 AUD ($6,900). Over 7,000 individuals have
subsequently signed a petition against this bill.
The
motivation for capping cash transactions is purportedly to deter illicit
activities, including money laundering and tax evasion. Robert Barwick,
the director of Citizens Electoral Council of Australia — who initiated
the petition — argued that this is misguided. He remarked:
“Banning
cash transactions over $10,000 will not end the tax evasion and money
laundering of the ‘black economy’, but will strip individuals of their
right to privacy in financial affairs, and trap them in private banks,
unable to escape policies such as ‘bail-in’ and negative interest
rates.”
source link
